Home  ›  Ok Google Show Me Article From Yahoo That Says That in Humans Comes Out to Poor Reviews

Ok Google Show Me Article From Yahoo That Says That in Humans Comes Out to Poor Reviews

Written By Monday, April 18, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Major information breaches which occurred at Yahoo!

The Internet service company Yahoo! was field of study to the largest information breach on record.[ane] Two major data breaches of user business relationship data to hackers were revealed during the second one-half of 2016. The first announced breach, reported in September 2016, had occurred sometime in late 2014, and afflicted over 500 million Yahoo! user accounts.[2] A separate information alienation, occurring earlier effectually August 2013, was reported in Dec 2016. Initially believed to have affected over i billion user accounts,[three] Yahoo! later affirmed in October 2017 that all 3 billion of its user accounts were impacted.[4] Both breaches are considered the largest discovered in the history of the Net. Specific details of material taken include names, email addresses, telephone numbers, encrypted or unencrypted security questions and answers, dates of birth, and hashed passwords.[five] Farther, Yahoo! reported that the late 2014 breach likely used manufactured web cookies to falsify login credentials, allowing hackers to gain access to any account without a password.[6] [seven] [8] [9]

Yahoo! has been criticized for their belatedly disclosure of the breaches and their security measures, and is currently facing several lawsuits as well as investigation past members of the U.s.a. Congress. The breaches impacted Verizon Communications's July 2016 plans to acquire Yahoo! for about $iv.8 billion, which resulted in a decrease of $350 million in the terminal price on the deal closed in June 2017.[x]

Description [edit]

July 2016 discovery [edit]

Around July 2016, account names and passwords for virtually 200 1000000 Yahoo! accounts were presented for sale on the darknet market site, "TheRealDeal".[11] [12] The seller, known as "Peace_of_Mind" or simply "Peace", stated in confidential interviews with Vice and Wired, that he had the data for some fourth dimension and had been selling it privately since almost belatedly 2015. Peace has previously been connected to sales of similar individual information information from other hacks including that from the 2012 LinkedIn hack.[xiii] [fourteen] Peace stated the information likely dates back to 2012, and security experts believed it may have been parts of other data hacks at that time; while some of the sample accounts were still active, they lacked necessary information to fully login properly, reflecting their historic period.[13] Experts believe that Peace is only a broker of the information that hackers obtain and sell through him.[15] Yahoo! stated they were aware of the data and were evaluating it, cautioning users about the situation but did not reset account passwords at that time.[13]

Late 2014 breach [edit]

The first reported data breach in 2016 had taken place former in late 2014, according to Yahoo![16] [17] [eighteen] The hackers had obtained information from over 500 million user accounts, including business relationship names, email addresses, telephone numbers, dates of nascence, hashed passwords, and in some cases, encrypted or unencrypted security questions and answers.[xx] Security experts noted that the bulk of Yahoo!'s passwords used the bcrypt hashing algorithm, which is considered hard to cleft, with the rest using the older MD5 algorithm, which can be cleaved rather quickly.[21]

Such information, peculiarly security questions and answers, could help hackers intermission into victims' other online accounts.[22] [23] Estimator security experts cautioned that the incident could take far-reaching consequences involving privacy, potentially including finance and banking as well equally personal information of people'southward lives, including information pulled from any other accounts that can be hacked with the gained business relationship data.[two] Experts also noted that there may be millions of people with Flickr, Sky and/or BT accounts who exercise non realize that they indirectly have a Yahoo! account as a event of past acquisitions and agreements made with Yahoo!,[24] or even Yahoo! users who stopped using their accounts years earlier.[23] [25] [26] [27]

Yahoo! reported the alienation to the public on September 22, 2016. Yahoo! believes the alienation was committed by "state-sponsored" hackers,[28] but did not proper name whatever country.[5] Yahoo! affirmed the hacker was no longer in their systems and that the company was fully cooperating with law enforcement.[29] The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) confirmed that it was investigating the affair.[5]

In its November 2016 SEC filing, Yahoo! reported they had been aware of an intrusion into their network in 2014, but had non understood the extent of the alienation until it began investigation of a separate information breach incident effectually July 2016.[6] [30] Wired believes this separate data breach involved the Peace data from July 2016.[18] Yahoo!'s previous SEC filing on September 9, prior to the breach proclamation, had stated that it was not enlightened of whatever "security breaches" or "loss, theft, unauthorized access or acquisition" of user information.[31]

The November 2016 SEC filing noted that the visitor believed the data breach had been conducted through a cookie-based attack that allowed hackers to authenticate equally any other user without their countersign.[6] [seven] [32] Yahoo! and its exterior security analysts confirmed this was the method of intrusion in their December 2016 announcement of the August 2013 information breach, and had invalidated all previous cookies to eliminate this road.[3] [viii] [33] In a regulatory filing in 2017, Yahoo! reported that 32 one thousand thousand accounts were accessed through this cookie-based set on through 2015 and 2016.[34] Multiple experts believe that the security breach was the largest such incident fabricated public in the history of the Internet at the time.[5] [35]

Baronial 2013 alienation [edit]

The first data breach occurred on Yahoo! servers in Baronial 2013; Yahoo! stated this was a carve up breach from the late 2014 one and was conducted by an "unauthorized 3rd political party".[three] Similar information every bit from the late 2014 breach had been taken from over 1 billion user accounts, including unencrypted security questions and answers. Yahoo! reported the breach on December 14, 2016, and forced all affected users to modify passwords, and to reenter any unencrypted security questions and answers to brand them encrypted in the time to come.[3] In February 2017, Yahoo! notified some users that data from the breach and forged cookies could have been used to access these accounts.[36] This breach is now considered the largest known alienation of its kind on the Net.[three] [37] In October 2017, Yahoo! updated its cess of the hack, and stated that it believes all of its three billion accounts at the fourth dimension of the Baronial 2013 alienation were afflicted.[4] [38]

Co-ordinate to Yahoo! this new breach was discovered while it was reviewing data given to them from law enforcement from an unnamed tertiary-party hacker about a calendar month prior.[39] They had been able to identify the method by which data were taken from the last 2014 hack using simulated cookies during this investigation, just the method of the August 2013 breach was not articulate to them upon their announcement.[iii] Andrew Komarov, principal intelligence officer of the cybersecurity firm InfoArmor, had been helping Yahoo! and police enforcement already in response to the Peace data. In trying to rails down the source of Peace'southward data, he discovered evidence of this latest breach from a dark web seller offering a list of more than one billion Yahoo! accounts for about $300,000 in August 2015. While two of the 3 buyers of this data were found to exist cloak-and-dagger spammers, the third buyer had specifically asked the seller of the Yahoo! information to assert if ten names of Usa and foreign government officials were on the offered list and data associated with them. Suspecting that this buyer may have been related to a foreign intelligence agency, Komarov discovered that the offered data included the accounts of over 150,000 names of people working for the United States government and military, too as additional accounts associated with European Wedlock, Canadian, British, and Australian governments.[39] [forty] Komarov alerted the appropriate agencies virtually this new data set and began working with them straight.[39] Komarov noted that while U.S. regime policies have changed to proceed central intelligence employees every bit easygoing every bit possible, these affected users likely set up Yahoo! accounts for personal utilise well before such policies were in place, and included their work details equally part of their profiles, making this information highly valuable for foreign intelligence groups.[xl] Komarov had opted not to become to Yahoo! about the data, equally they had previously been dismissive of InfoArmor's services in the past, and Komarov believed that Yahoo! would non thoroughly investigate the state of affairs as information technology would threaten their Verizon buyout.[39]

In improver to government issues, Komarov and other security firms warned that the data from this alienation can be used to effort admission to other accounts, since it included backup email contact addresses and security questions. Such data, these experts warn, could be used to create phishing attacks to lure users into revealing sensitive information which can then exist used for malicious purposes. Hold Security, another cybersecurity firm, observed that some darkweb sellers were still selling this database for up to $200,000 as late as October 2016; Komarov found that the data continues to exist available at a much lower toll since the passwords take been forced changed, but the information can still be valuable for phishing attacks and gaining access to other accounts.[39]

Attribution and motivation [edit]

According to Yahoo!, the 2014 breach was carried out by a "land-sponsored actor"[29] and the organisation claims that such "intrusions and thefts by state-sponsored actors have become increasingly common across the technology industry".[22] While Yahoo! did not proper noun any country, some doubtable China or Russian federation to be behind the hack, while others doubt Yahoo's merits of any state actor.[five] [41] [42]

U.South. intelligence officials, who declined to give their names to the media, highlighted similarities between the assail and previous breaches linked to the Russian government.[5] Yahoo! in fall 2014 detected what it believed was a pocket-sized alienation "involving 30 to 40 accounts", carried out by hackers believed to be "working on behalf of the Russian authorities", according to Yahoo! executives, because it was launched from computers in that country. Yahoo! reported the incident to the FBI in late 2014 and notified affected users.[43]

Sean Sullivan, a security adviser at cyber security business firm F-Secure Labs, declared China to be his top suspect and said that "at that place have been no past cases of a service provider like Yahoo! being targeted [by Russia]," whose hackers tend to perpetrate targeted attacks, either in areas important for their economy, such every bit the energy sector, or to undermine politicians, while "Communist china likes to vacuum up all kinds of information" and "has a voracious appetite for personal data".[44] Examples of state-sponsored data breaches with Cathay in suspicion include the massive information breach[45] of 18 one thousand thousand people from the United States Office of Personnel Management and the attacks on Google in 2010, dubbed Operation Aurora.[44]

Others expressed doubt nearly Yahoo'south merits of the set on beingness state-sponsored, as it would be less embarrassing for Yahoo! to aspect an attack to a nation land, which typically have the well-nigh sophisticated hacking capabilities, than to attribute it to a cybercriminal grouping or individual—particularly as Yahoo! was in the centre of existence acquired past Verizon.[41] Senior inquiry scientist Kenneth Geers from Comodo, withal, noted that "Yahoo! is a strategic player on the World wide web, which makes it a practiced—and valid—target for nation-state intelligence collection".[41] One of the furnishings, if non the directly goal, of the breaches was the utilise of the stolen usernames and passwords for credential stuffing attacks.[46]

InfoArmor issued a written report that challenged Yahoo'southward merits that a nation-state orchestrated the heist after reviewing a small sample of compromised accounts.[47] InfoArmor had been able to obtain the list of afflicted accounts for analysis. InfoArmor determined that the alienation was probable the piece of work of an Eastern European criminal gang that later sold the entire hacked database to at least three clients, including 1 state-sponsored group. According to InfoArmor, by early on 2015, the group no longer offered to sell the full database, but sought "to extract something from the dump for significant amounts of money." The report noted that it was difficult to decide who the ultimate mastermind of a hack might be, every bit criminal hackers sometimes provide information to authorities intelligence agencies or offering their services for rent. Komarov said the hackers may be related to Grouping Due east, who have had a runway tape of selling stolen personal data on the dark web, primarily to underground spammers, and were previously linked to breaches at LinkedIn, Tumblr, and MySpace.[48] InfoArmor had linked Group Due east as the source of the information that were offered by Peace, and believed that Group E was brokering the data to dark web sellers.[15] While InfoArmor did not believe a state-sponsored agency committed the breach, they warned of implications on foreign intelligences, every bit the breaches "opens the door to pregnant opportunities for cyber-espionage and targeted attacks," and may be the key in several targeted attacks against U.S. government personnel, which resulted after the disclosed contacts of the affected high-level officials of intelligence community in October 2015.[47] [49]

Yahoo! stated that the 2013 alienation is connected "to the aforementioned state-sponsored histrion believed to be responsible for the data theft the company disclosed on September 22, 2016."[37] White Firm spokespersons stated that the FBI is currently investigating this breach, though the scope of its impact is unclear.[50] A United States official, speaking to CBS News, says that government investigators concur with Yahoo! that the hack was sponsored by a foreign country, possibly Russia.[51] Security experts speculate that because trivial of the data from this 2013 alienation have been made bachelor on the black market, the alienation was probable targeted to notice information on specific people.[51]

Prosecution [edit]

On March 15, 2017, the FBI officially charged the 2014 breach to four men, including two that work for Russian federation's Federal Security Service (FSB). In its statement, the FBI said "The criminal conduct at event, carried out and otherwise facilitated by officers from an FSB unit that serves as the FBI'due south indicate of contact in Moscow on cybercrime matters, is across the pale."[52] The four men accused include Alexsey Belan, a hacker on the FBI Ten Near Wanted Fugitives list, FSB agents Dmitry Dokuchaev and Igor Sushchin who the FBI accused of paying Belan and other hackers to conduct the hack, and Canadian hacker Karim Baratov who the FBI claimed was paid by Dokuchaev and Sushchin to use information obtained by the Yahoo! breaches to breach into well-nigh lxxx non-Yahoo! accounts of specific targets.[53] Baratov, the only man currently arrested, was extradited to the United States, though had claimed not guilty to the charges in Baronial 2017.[53] All the same, he later pled guilty, admitting to hacking into at least eighty email accounts on behalf of Russian contacts. He was charged with nine counts of hacking, and in May 2018 sentenced to five years in prison and ordered to pay US$2.25 million and restitution to his victims.[54]

Legal and commercial responses [edit]

Yahoo! [edit]

Yahoo!'due south filibuster in discovering and reporting these breaches, also as implementing improved security features, has become a point of criticism.[55] Yahoo! has been taken to task for having a seemingly lax attitude towards security: the company reportedly does non implement new security features as fast as other Net companies, and after Yahoo! was identified by Edward Snowden as a frequent target for state-sponsored hackers in 2013, information technology took the company a full twelvemonth before hiring a dedicated primary information security officer, Alex Stamos. While Stamos' hiring was praised by technology experts as showing Yahoo!'s commitment towards better security, Yahoo! CEO Marissa Mayer had reportedly denied Stamos and his security team sufficient funds to implement recommended stronger security measures, and he departed the company past 2015. Experts take pointed out that Yahoo!, simply until the most contempo breaches, had not forced affected users to alter their passwords, a motion that Mayer and her team believed would drive users abroad from the service.[56] Some experts stated that implementing stronger security measures does take monetary resources, and Yahoo!'s fiscal situation has non allowed the company to invest in cybersecurity.[55]

Yahoo!'due south internal review of the situation constitute that Mayer and other primal executives knew of the intrusions only failed to inform the company or take steps to foreclose farther breaches. The review led to the resignation of the company's principle lawyer, Ronald S. Bell by March 2017, and Mayer's disinterestedness bounty bonus for 2016 and 2017 was pulled.[57]

Verizon Communications merger deal [edit]

In July 2016, prior to the announcement of the breaches Verizon Communications had entered into negotiations and blessing to buy a portion of the Yahoo! properties for $four.viii billion, with the deal set up to close in March 2017.[35] Verizon had only become aware of the 2014 breach just ii days prior to the Yahoo! September proclamation.[5] CEO Lowell McAdam said he wasn't shocked past the hack, saying "we all live in an cyberspace world, it's not a question of if you're going to get hacked simply when you are going to get hacked". He left the door open to possibly renegotiate the $4.83 billion price tag.[58] Craig Silliman, Verizon's general counsel told reporters in Washington Verizon has "a reasonable basis to believe correct now that the impact is material" and that they're "looking to Yahoo to demonstrate [...] the full affect". The company'south reputation has suffered online in the last few months, according to an assay by marketing firm Spredfast: about xc percent of the Twitter comments near Yahoo! were negative in Oct, upward from 68 percent in August, before news of the hack.[59] Following the announcement of the August 2013 breach, Verizon was reportedly seeking to change terms of the bargain to reflect on the impact of these breaches, including lowering their offer or potentially seeking court action every bit to cease the deal. Verizon stated that they volition "review the impact of this new development before reaching any terminal conclusions".[60] In February 2017, Verizon and Yahoo! appear that the deal volition however become forward, merely dropping the sale cost by $350 million, downward to $four.48 billion.[61] The bargain officially closed at this reduced price in June 2017, with Mayer stepping down as CEO following the closure.[62] Verizon and Yahoo! will share jointly in the ongoing costs for the government investigation of the breaches under this new term.[63] The remaining properties of Yahoo! not purchased by Verizon, which included the Alibaba Group, were renamed to Altaba in June 2017.[64]

United States government [edit]

Members of the U.South. Government have been critical of Yahoo!'due south reactions to these breaches. In a letter to Yahoo! CEO Marissa Mayer, six Democratic U.Due south. Senators (Elizabeth Warren, Patrick Leahy, Al Franken, Richard Blumenthal, Ron Wyden and Ed Markey) demanded answers on when Yahoo! discovered the last 2014 breach, and why it took and then long to disclose it to the public, calling the time lag between the security breach and its disclosure 'unacceptable'.[65] [66] [67] On September 26, 2016 democratic senator Mark Warner asked the U.Due south. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to investigate whether Yahoo! and its senior executives fulfilled their obligations under federal securities laws to properly disclose the attack. In his alphabetic character,[68] Warner as well asked the SEC to evaluate whether the electric current disclosure regime was adequate. Jacob Olcott, who helped develop the SEC data alienation disclosure rules and former Senate Commerce Committee counsel, noted that due to the size of the breach, intense public scrutiny and incertitude over the timing of Yahoo'due south discovery, the hack could go a examination instance of the SEC'south guidelines.[69] [70] Following the annunciation of the August 2013 breach, Sen. Warner called for a full investigation of the state of affairs, request "why its cyber defenses accept been so weak as to have compromised over a billion users".[60] In April 2018, the SEC announced that it had reached a deal with Altaba, the company that holds the assets of Yahoo! non purchased by Verizon, for The states$35 million for failure to disclose the 2014 breach in a timely manner.[71]

Course action lawsuits [edit]

By November ix, 2016, it was reported that 23 lawsuits related to the late 2014 alienation had been filed against Yahoo! so far.[30] In one lawsuit, filed in the U.S. Commune Courtroom for the Southern District of California in San Diego, the plaintiffs argue that the hack caused an "intrusion into personal fiscal matters." In another lawsuit, filed in the U.South. Commune Court for the Northern District of California in San Jose, the plaintiff contends that Yahoo! acted with gross negligence in dealing with and reporting the security breach. Yahoo! declined to annotate on ongoing litigation.[35] Five of these 23 cases were combined into a single arrange in early Dec 2016 to be heard in San Jose in March 2017.[72] The presiding guess authorized the class-action lawsuit to get forward in August 2017, citing that those affected past the alienation had the right to sue Yahoo! for alienation of contract and unfair competition claims made in the original filing.[73] The example was later amended to include the updated alienation information post-obit Yahoo!'s announcement about the August 2013. By March 2018, Verizon, which had completed its acquisition of Yahoo!, sought to dismiss much of the instance, but Approximate Lucy H. Koh refused, assuasive claims related to breach of contract and negligence to be tried in the trial.[74] Earlier trial could embark, Verizon and Altaba agreed to split the cost of a US$50 million settlement in October 2018 with those in the class activity (an estimated 200 1000000 total users), along with providing two years of free credit monitoring through AllClear ID, pending approving past Approximate Koh. In the settlement, those that tin can certificate identity theft harm from the breach tin seek up to The states$375 from the settlement, otherwise, those with known afflicted Yahoo accounts can seek up to U.s.$125.[75] Guess Koh rejected the settlement offer, questioning the lack of transparency of the details of the settlements, besides equally high costs recouped by the lawyers through the settlement.[76] Yahoo! eventually agreed to settle for $117.v million in April 2019, again offering affected users credit monitoring or a cash payout dependent on the number of respondents in the class.[77]

Following the Dec 14 announcement of the Baronial 2013 hacks, another course-action lawsuit was filed against Yahoo! in New York state on behalf of all afflicted United states of america residents, stating that "Yahoo! failed, and continues to fail, to provide adequate protection of its users' personal and confidential information."[78]

International [edit]

Strange governments have too shown concerns on the several data breaches. On October 28, the European privacy regulators "Article 29 Working Party" outlined concerns about the 2014 data alienation equally well as allegations that the company congenital a organization that scanned customers' incoming emails at the request of U.Due south. intelligence services in a letter[79] to Yahoo.[80] They asked Yahoo! to communicate all aspects of the data breach to the European union authorities, to notify the afflicted users of the "agin effects" and to cooperate with all "upcoming national data protection regime' enquiries and/or investigations".[81] In late November, Republic of ireland'southward Information Protection Commissioner (DPC), the lead European regulator on privacy problems for Yahoo! whose European headquarters are in Dublin, said that it had stepped upwards its exam of the alienation, that it was awaiting information from Yahoo! on allegations that it helped the U.S. government scan users' emails, and that Yahoo! was not investigating the breach but just examining it.[82] Frg's Federal Office for Information Security criticized Yahoo! following the December 2016 annunciation, stating "security is not a foreign concept", and warned government and other German users to seek electronic mail and Cyberspace solutions from companies with better security approaches.[83]

See also [edit]

  • 2012 Yahoo! Voices hack
  • Corporate warfare
  • Database security
  • Information security
  • Internet security
  • Listing of information breaches
  • Multi-factor authentication
  • Security hacker
  • Web literacy

References [edit]

  1. ^ Melt, James (Oct 16, 2020). "British Airways fined £20m for data breach affecting 400,000 customers". The Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved October 17, 2020.
  2. ^ a b Perlroth, Nicole (September 22, 2016). "Yahoo Says Hackers Stole Information on 500 One thousand thousand Users in 2014". The New York Times . Retrieved September 22, 2016.
  3. ^ a b c d e f Goel, Vindu (Dec 14, 2016). "Yahoo Says ane Billion User Accounts Were Hacked". The New York Times . Retrieved December 14, 2016.
  4. ^ a b McMillan, Robert; Knutson, Ryan (October three, 2017). "Yahoo Triples Estimate of Breached Accounts to 3". The Wall Street Periodical . Retrieved Oct three, 2017.
  5. ^ a b c d due east f g "Yahoo 'state' hackers stole data from 500 million users". BBC News. September 23, 2016. Retrieved September 23, 2016.
  6. ^ a b c "Yahoo discovered hack leading to major data alienation ii years before it was disclosed". The Washington Post . Retrieved November 10, 2016.
  7. ^ a b "Yahoo knew of 'country-backed' hack in 2014". BBC. Retrieved November 10, 2016.
  8. ^ a b Newman, Lily Hay (December 14, 2016). "Hack Cursory: Hackers Breach a Billion Yahoo Accounts. A Billion". Wired . Retrieved December 15, 2016.
  9. ^ Gammarays (January 16, 2009). "A Postal service-mortem of Yahoo! Business relationship Security". Exploit Database . Retrieved February 16, 2020.
  10. ^ Goel, Vindu (Feb 21, 2017). "Verizon Will Pay $350 Million Less for Yahoo (Published 2017)". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved Nov viii, 2020.
  11. ^ Cox, Joseph. "The Ambassador of the Dark Spider web's Infamous Hacking Market Has Vanished". Vice Motherboard. Retrieved September 22, 2016.
  12. ^ Szoldra, Paul. "The dark spider web marketplace where yous can buy 200 1000000 Yahoo accounts is under cyberattack". Business Insider . Retrieved September 22, 2016.
  13. ^ a b c Cox, Joseph (Baronial 1, 2016). "Yahoo 'Aware' Hacker Is Advertising 200 Million Supposed Accounts on Dark Web". Vice . Retrieved Dec 16, 2016.
  14. ^ Greenberg, Andy. "An Interview With the Hacker Probably Selling Your Password Correct Now". WIRED . Retrieved September 22, 2016.
  15. ^ a b Szoldra, Paul. "A cybersecurity house is telling ii very dissimilar stories of the Yahoo hack to news organizations". Retrieved October 15, 2016.
  16. ^ Brian, Womack. "Yahoo Says at Least 500 Million Accounts Breached in Assail". Bloomberg L.P. Retrieved September 22, 2016.
  17. ^ Cox, Joseph. "Yahoo 'Aware' Hacker Is Advertising 200 One thousand thousand Supposed Accounts on Dark Web". Vice Motherboard. Retrieved September 25, 2016.
  18. ^ a b Greenberg, Andy (September 22, 2016). "Hack Brief: Yahoo Breach Hits Half a Billion Users". Wired . Retrieved December xv, 2016.
  19. ^ "Account Security Issue FAQs". Yahoo!. Retrieved September 23, 2016.
  20. ^ Goodin, Dan (September 22, 2016). "Yahoo says half a billion accounts breached by nation-sponsored hackers". Ars Technica . Retrieved December 15, 2016.
  21. ^ a b "Yahoo says 'state-sponsored' hack stole personal data from 500m accounts". The National . Retrieved September 25, 2016.
  22. ^ a b Weise, Elizabeth. "Are you a Yahoo user? Do this right now". USA Today . Retrieved September 25, 2016.
  23. ^ Chocolate-brown, Aaron. "If you lot're a Sky or BT customer – yous need to reset your countersign Now afterward Yahoo hack". Sun Express . Retrieved September 25, 2016.
  24. ^ Isidore, Chris. "You could have a Yahoo account without even knowing it". CNN. Retrieved September 25, 2016.
  25. ^ Joseph, Rebecca. "Here'south what you lot need to know about the Yahoo hack". GlobalNews. Retrieved September 25, 2016.
  26. ^ Griffin, Andrew. "Yahoo hack: Hundreds of millions of people probably don't know they are part of the globe's biggest information breach". The Contained . Retrieved September 25, 2016.
  27. ^ Tsukayama, Hayley; Timberg, Craig; Fung, Brian (September 22, 2016). "Yahoo confirms data breach affecting at least 500 million accounts". The Washington Post . Retrieved September 22, 2016.
  28. ^ a b "Yahoo confirms data breach affecting at least 500 1000000 accounts". The Washington Post. September 22, 2016. Retrieved September 22, 2016.
  29. ^ a b "Yahoo Employees Knew in 2014 About State-Sponsored Hacker Attack". The New York Times . Retrieved November 10, 2016.
  30. ^ McMillan, Robert. "Yahoo Hackers Were Criminals Rather Than State-Sponsored, Security House Says". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved Oct 15, 2016.
  31. ^ Vaas, Lisa. "Yahoo staff knew they were breached two years agone". Naked Security. Retrieved December 12, 2016.
  32. ^ "Yahoo Security Notice December 14, 2016". Yahoo!. December xiv, 2016. Retrieved February 17, 2017.
  33. ^ Lawler, Richard (March i, 2017). "Yahoo hackers accessed 32 meg accounts with forged cookies". Engadget . Retrieved March ane, 2017.
  34. ^ a b c Larson, Selena (September 23, 2016). "Yahoo facing lawsuits in the wake of massive data alienation". CNN. Retrieved September 25, 2016.
  35. ^ Castillo, Michelle (February 15, 2017). "Yahoo'southward new hack alarm comes from a third breach, the company says". CNBC . Retrieved February eighteen, 2017.
  36. ^ a b Wells, Nicholas; Fahey, Marker (Dec fifteen, 2016). "How Yahoo'southward one billion account breach stacks upwardly with the biggest hacks ever". CNBC . Retrieved December 15, 2016.
  37. ^ Haselton, Todd (Oct 3, 2017). "Yahoo just said every single account was afflicted by 2013 set on — 3 billion in all". CNBC . Retrieved October 3, 2017.
  38. ^ a b c d e Goel, Vindu; Perlroth, Nicole (Dec 16, 2016). "Hacked Yahoo Information Is for Sale on Night Web". The New York Times . Retrieved Dec 16, 2016.
  39. ^ a b May, Patrick (December 15, 2016). "How a super cyber-sleuth helped crack the huge Yahoo hack". The Mercury News . Retrieved December xv, 2016.
  40. ^ a b c Solon, Olivia. "China and Russia lead list of Yahoo hack suspects — merely some doubtfulness theory". The Guardian . Retrieved September 25, 2016.
  41. ^ "U.S. Suspects Hackers in Cathay Breached Nearly iv Meg People's Records, Officials Say". The Wall Street Periodical . Retrieved September 26, 2016.
  42. ^ McMillan, Robert. "Yahoo Executives Detected a Hack Tied to Russia in 2014". The Wall Street Periodical . Retrieved September 25, 2016.
  43. ^ a b Murgia, Madhumita. "Cyber experts wait to usual suspects in Yahoo hack". Financial Times . Retrieved September 25, 2016.
  44. ^ Nakashima, Ellen. "National Security Chinese breach information of 4 1000000 federal workers". The Washington Post . Retrieved September 25, 2016.
  45. ^ Horgan, Richard. "Yahoo Breach May Take Led to 'Credential Stuffing'". AdWeek . Retrieved March 23, 2017.
  46. ^ a b "InfoArmor: Yahoo Data Alienation Investigation". Retrieved October 15, 2016.
  47. ^ "Hither'southward Who Hacked Yahoo, According to One Cybersecurity Firm". Fortune. Retrieved October 15, 2016.
  48. ^ Womack, Brian. "Yahoo Hacked by Criminals, Not Country Sponsor, Security Firm Says". Bloomberg L.P. Retrieved October 15, 2016.
  49. ^ "The White House Says the FBI Is Investigating the Latest Yahoo Hack". Reuters. December 15, 2016. Retrieved December 15, 2016.
  50. ^ a b "Police enforcement says Yahoo account hacks were likely sponsored by foreign government". CBS News. December xv, 2016. Retrieved Dec 15, 2016.
  51. ^ Goel, Vindu (March xv, 2017). "Russian Agents Were Behind Yahoo Breach, U.S. Says". The New York Times . Retrieved March fifteen, 2017.
  52. ^ a b Raymond, Nate (November 24, 2017). "Canadian charged in Yahoo hacking case to plead guilty in U.S." Reuters. Retrieved Nov 27, 2017.
  53. ^ Moon, Mariella (May thirty, 2018). "Attacker involved in 2014 Yahoo hack gets v years in prison". Engadget . Retrieved May 30, 2018.
  54. ^ a b "Why Yahoo's Security Issues Are a Story of Too Picayune, Also Late". Reuters. December xix, 2016. Retrieved Dec xix, 2016.
  55. ^ Perlroth, Nicole; Goel, Vindu (September 28, 2016). "Defending Against Hackers Took a Back Seat at Yahoo, Insiders Say". The New York Times . Retrieved December xv, 2016.
  56. ^ Goel, Vindu (March 1, 2017). "Yahoo'south Top Lawyer Resigns and C.E.O. Marissa Mayer Loses Bonus in Wake of Hack". The New York Times . Retrieved March 15, 2017.
  57. ^ "Verizon CEO Says Evaluating Whether Yahoo Hack Had 'Material Impact'". The Wall Street Periodical. Retrieved October 15, 2016.
  58. ^ "Verizon Says Yahoo Hack Could Reopen $4.8 Billion Bargain Talks". The New York Times . Retrieved October 15, 2016.
  59. ^ a b Roumeliotis, Greg; Volz, Dustin (December fifteen, 2016). "Yahoo shares fall on worries new breach will kill Verizon deal". Reuters . Retrieved Dec fifteen, 2016.
  60. ^ "Yahoo Data Breach: What Actually Happened?". BPB Online . Retrieved April 28, 2021.
  61. ^ "Verizon closes Yahoo deal, Mayer steps downward". Reuters. June 14, 2017. Retrieved June 14, 2017.
  62. ^ "Verizon revises deal with Yahoo to $4.48 billion". Reuters. February 21, 2017. Retrieved February 21, 2017 – via CNBC.
  63. ^ La Monica, Paul (June nineteen, 2017). "Then long, Yahoo. Hello ... Altaba?". CNN . Retrieved Apr 24, 2018.
  64. ^ "Letter to Marissa Mayer signed by 6 senators" (PDF). leahy.senate.gov . Retrieved September xxx, 2016.
  65. ^ Fisher, Dennis. "Senators Demand Answers of Mayer on Yahoo Data Alienation". OnTheWire. Retrieved September xxx, 2016.
  66. ^ Kuchler, Hannah. "The states senators demand answers from Yahoo". The Financial Times. Retrieved September 30, 2016.
  67. ^ "20160926 Letter to SEC on Yahoo Breach". Retrieved December 13, 2016.
  68. ^ Volz, Dustin. "Yahoo hack may become examination case for SEC data alienation disclosure rules". Reuters. Retrieved December 13, 2016.
  69. ^ "Sen. Warner Calls on SEC to Investigate Disclosure of Yahoo Breach". September 26, 2016. Retrieved December 13, 2016.
  70. ^ Kastrenakes, Jacob (Apr 24, 2018). "SEC problems $35 meg fine over Yahoo failing to disclose data breach". The Verge . Retrieved April 24, 2018.
  71. ^ Baron, Ethan (Dec 8, 2016). "Yahoo data-breach class-action lawsuits joined together in San Jose federal courtroom". Silicon Shell . Retrieved December fifteen, 2016.
  72. ^ Stempel, Jonathan (Baronial 31, 2017). "Yahoo must confront litigation by information alienation victims: U.S. guess". Reuters . Retrieved August 31, 2017.
  73. ^ Stempel, Jonathan (March 12, 2018). "Information alienation victims can sue Yahoo in the U.s.a.: estimate". Reuters. Retrieved March 12, 2018.
  74. ^ Liedtke, Michael (October 23, 2018). "Yahoo to pay $50M, other costs for massive security breach". ABC News . Retrieved Oct 23, 2018.
  75. ^ Fingas, Jon (January 29, 2019). "Estimate rejects Yahoo'south proposed settlement over data breaches". Engadget . Retrieved January 29, 2019.
  76. ^ Brodkin, Jon (April 10, 2019). "Yahoo tries to settle three-billion-account data breach with $118 million payout". Ars Technica . Retrieved October 1, 2019.
  77. ^ Fisk, Margaret Cronin (December xv, 2016). "Yahoo Failed to Protect Consumers From Hacking, Lawsuit Says". Bloomberg . Retrieved December xv, 2016.
  78. ^ "ARTICLE 29 Data Protection Working Party Letter To Yahoo!" (PDF) . Retrieved November 2, 2016.
  79. ^ "European union Problems Data-Protection Warning to WhatsApp, Yahoo". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved October 29, 2016.
  80. ^ Fioretti, Julia. "EU data protection watchdogs warn WhatsApp, Yahoo on privacy". Reuters. Retrieved October 29, 2016.
  81. ^ Bergin, Tom. "Irish data regulator steps upwards Yahoo hack probe, waits on email scanning". Reuters. Retrieved November 26, 2016.
  82. ^ "Frg Slams Yahoo Over Cybersecurity Practices". Reuters. December 15, 2016. Retrieved December 15, 2016.

External links [edit]

  • Yahoo's Business relationship Security Issue FAQs

higginshards1980.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yahoo%21_data_breaches

0 Response to "Ok Google Show Me Article From Yahoo That Says That in Humans Comes Out to Poor Reviews"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel